Medama vs Redash
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
VS
Redash
Connect, query, visualize, and share your data
| Feature | Medama | Redash |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 636 | ★ 28,737 |
| First released | 2024 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Tableau, Mode Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose Redash if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 28.7k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Medama or Redash better?
Neither is universally better. Redash has the larger community, while Medama is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Medama and Redash free and open-source?
Yes. Medama is licensed under MIT and Redash under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Medama and Redash with Docker?
Medama: yes. Redash: yes.