Medama vs Postiz
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
VS
Postiz
Schedule posts, track the performance of your content, and manage all
| Feature | Medama | Postiz |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 636 | ★ 34,393 |
| First released | 2024 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Postiz if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 34.4k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Medama or Postiz better?
Neither is universally better. Postiz has the larger community, while Medama is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Medama and Postiz free and open-source?
Yes. Medama is licensed under MIT and Postiz under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Medama and Postiz with Docker?
Medama: yes. Postiz: yes.