Mayan EDMS vs Plone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mayan EDMS
Free electronic document management with workflows
VS
Plone
Enterprise CMS and document repository with strong security
| Feature | Mayan EDMS | Plone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,100 | ★ 310 |
| First released | 2011 | 2001 |
| Replaces | DocuWare, M-Files | SharePoint |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Mayan EDMS or Plone better?
Neither is universally better. Mayan EDMS has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Mayan EDMS and Plone free and open-source?
Yes. Mayan EDMS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Plone under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mayan EDMS and Plone with Docker?
Mayan EDMS: yes. Plone: yes.