BentoPDF vs Mayan EDMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BentoPDF
Powerful, privacy-first, client-side PDF toolkit that allows you to
VS
Mayan EDMS
Free electronic document management with workflows
| Feature | BentoPDF | Mayan EDMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,551 | ★ 1,100 |
| First released | 2026 | 2011 |
| Replaces | — | DocuWare, M-Files |
Why pick each one
Choose BentoPDF if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 14.6k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is BentoPDF or Mayan EDMS better?
BentoPDF is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Mayan EDMS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are BentoPDF and Mayan EDMS free and open-source?
Yes. BentoPDF is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Mayan EDMS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BentoPDF and Mayan EDMS with Docker?
BentoPDF: yes. Mayan EDMS: yes.