Matomo vs TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Matomo
Powerful, privacy-respecting web analytics platform
VS
TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted
Privacy-focused analytics for apps and games
| Feature | Matomo | TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Swift |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 21,749 | ★ 225 |
| First released | 2007 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Firebase Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Swift
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Matomo or TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted better?
Neither is universally better. Matomo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Matomo and TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted free and open-source?
Yes. Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 and TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Matomo and TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted with Docker?
Matomo: yes. TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted: yes.