Daily Stars Explorer vs Matomo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Daily Stars Explorer
Track GitHub repo trends with daily star insights to see growth and
VS
Matomo
Powerful, privacy-respecting web analytics platform
| Feature | Daily Stars Explorer | Matomo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 396 | ★ 21,749 |
| First released | 2026 | 2007 |
| Replaces | — | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose Daily Stars Explorer if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Daily Stars Explorer or Matomo better?
Neither is universally better. Matomo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Daily Stars Explorer and Matomo free and open-source?
Yes. Daily Stars Explorer is licensed under MIT and Matomo under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Daily Stars Explorer and Matomo with Docker?
Daily Stars Explorer: yes. Matomo: yes.