Abby vs Matomo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Abby
Open-source A/B testing and feature flags
VS
Matomo
Powerful, privacy-respecting web analytics platform
| Feature | Abby | Matomo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 167 | ★ 21,749 |
| First released | 2023 | 2007 |
| Replaces | LaunchDarkly, Optimizely | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose Abby if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Abby or Matomo better?
Neither is universally better. Matomo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Abby and Matomo free and open-source?
Yes. Abby is licensed under MIT and Matomo under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Abby and Matomo with Docker?
Abby: yes. Matomo: yes.