Matomo vs Aptabase
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Matomo
Powerful, privacy-respecting web analytics platform
VS
Aptabase
Privacy-first analytics for apps and games
| Feature | Matomo | Aptabase |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 21,749 | ★ 1,774 |
| First released | 2007 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Firebase Analytics, Mixpanel |
Why pick each one
Choose Aptabase if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Matomo or Aptabase better?
Neither is universally better. Matomo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Matomo and Aptabase free and open-source?
Yes. Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Aptabase under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Matomo and Aptabase with Docker?
Matomo: yes. Aptabase: yes.