Mark Text vs memEx
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mark Text
Real-time preview Markdown editor for the desktop
VS
memEx
Structured personal knowledge base, inspired by zettlekasten and
| Feature | Mark Text | memEx |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Docker |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 59,781 | — |
| First released | 2017 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Typora | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Mark Text if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 59.8k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose memEx if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Docker
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Mark Text or memEx better?
Mark Text is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider memEx if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Mark Text and memEx free and open-source?
Yes. Mark Text is licensed under MIT and memEx under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mark Text and memEx with Docker?
Mark Text: check the project docs for container support. memEx: yes.