BatNoter vs Mark Text
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BatNoter
Markdown notes web app that stores notes in your Git repo
VS
Mark Text
Real-time preview Markdown editor for the desktop
| Feature | BatNoter | Mark Text |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,422 | ★ 59,781 |
| First released | 2022 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Standard Notes, Evernote | Typora |
Why pick each one
Choose BatNoter if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Mark Text if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 59.8k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is BatNoter or Mark Text better?
Mark Text is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider BatNoter if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are BatNoter and Mark Text free and open-source?
Yes. BatNoter is licensed under MIT and Mark Text under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BatNoter and Mark Text with Docker?
BatNoter: yes. Mark Text: check the project docs for container support.