Logseq vs Mark Text

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLogseqMark Text
CategoryNotes & Knowledge BaseNotes & Knowledge Base
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageClojureTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metalsource
GitHub stars★ 44,329★ 59,781
First released20202017
ReplacesNotion, Roam ResearchTypora

Why pick each one

Choose Logseq if…

  • Local-first and private
  • Great for linked thinking
  • Files stay portable
Logseq details

Choose Mark Text if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 59.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Mark Text details

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or Mark Text better?

Neither is universally better. Mark Text has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Logseq and Mark Text free and open-source?

Yes. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Mark Text under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Logseq and Mark Text with Docker?

Logseq: check the project docs for container support. Mark Text: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons