Atomic Server vs Mark Text
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Atomic Server
Knowledge graph database with documents (similar to Notion), tables,
VS
Mark Text
Real-time preview Markdown editor for the desktop
| Feature | Atomic Server | Mark Text |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,585 | ★ 59,781 |
| First released | 2024 | 2017 |
| Replaces | — | Typora |
Why pick each one
Choose Atomic Server if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Mark Text if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 59.8k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Atomic Server or Mark Text better?
Mark Text is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Atomic Server if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Atomic Server and Mark Text free and open-source?
Yes. Atomic Server is licensed under MIT and Mark Text under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Atomic Server and Mark Text with Docker?
Atomic Server: yes. Mark Text: check the project docs for container support.