Magic Wormhole vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMagic WormholeRestic
CategoryFile Sync & StorageBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITBSD-2-Clause
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 22,792★ 35,412
First released20162015
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Magic Wormhole if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 22.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
Magic Wormhole details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Magic Wormhole or Restic better?

Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community, while Magic Wormhole is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Magic Wormhole and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. Magic Wormhole is licensed under MIT and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Magic Wormhole and Restic with Docker?

Magic Wormhole: check the project docs for container support. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons