Magic Wormhole vs Filebin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Magic Wormhole
Get things from one computer to another, safely
VS
Filebin
Quick file sharing with auto-expiring bins
| Feature | Magic Wormhole | Filebin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 22,792 | ★ 274 |
| First released | 2016 | 2014 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer, AirDrop | WeTransfer, Firefox Send |
Why pick each one
Choose Magic Wormhole if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 22.8k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Choose Filebin if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Magic Wormhole or Filebin better?
Neither is universally better. Magic Wormhole has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Magic Wormhole and Filebin free and open-source?
Yes. Magic Wormhole is licensed under MIT and Filebin under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Magic Wormhole and Filebin with Docker?
Magic Wormhole: check the project docs for container support. Filebin: yes.