Magic Wormhole vs pgBackRest
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Magic Wormhole
Get things from one computer to another, safely
VS
pgBackRest
Reliable backup and restore solution for PostgreSQL
| Feature | Magic Wormhole | pgBackRest |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 22,792 | ★ 4,296 |
| First released | 2016 | 2013 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer, AirDrop | Veeam |
Why pick each one
Choose Magic Wormhole if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 22.8k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Choose pgBackRest if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is Magic Wormhole or pgBackRest better?
Magic Wormhole is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider pgBackRest if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Magic Wormhole and pgBackRest free and open-source?
Yes. Magic Wormhole is licensed under MIT and pgBackRest under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Magic Wormhole and pgBackRest with Docker?
Magic Wormhole: check the project docs for container support. pgBackRest: yes.