Mushroom vs Scrypted
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mushroom
Modern minimalist card collection for Home Assistant dashboards
VS
Scrypted
High-performance smart home and camera platform
| Feature | Mushroom | Scrypted |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,098 | ★ 5,839 |
| First released | 2022 | 2021 |
| Replaces | proprietary smart home apps | Google Home |
Why pick each one
Choose Mushroom if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Mushroom or Scrypted better?
Neither is universally better. Scrypted has the larger community, while Mushroom is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Mushroom and Scrypted free and open-source?
Yes. Mushroom is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Scrypted under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mushroom and Scrypted with Docker?
Mushroom: check the project docs for container support. Scrypted: yes.