OpenMQTTGateway vs Mushroom

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenMQTTGatewayMushroom
CategoryHome AutomationHome Automation
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageC++TypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM64 MB32 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarysource
GitHub stars★ 4,073★ 5,098
First released20162022
ReplacesSmartThings Hubproprietary smart home apps

Why pick each one

Choose OpenMQTTGateway if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (4.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
OpenMQTTGateway details

Choose Mushroom if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Mushroom details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenMQTTGateway or Mushroom better?

Mushroom is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenMQTTGateway if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are OpenMQTTGateway and Mushroom free and open-source?

Yes. OpenMQTTGateway is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mushroom under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenMQTTGateway and Mushroom with Docker?

OpenMQTTGateway: check the project docs for container support. Mushroom: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons