ESPHome vs Scrypted
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ESPHome
Configure ESP devices with simple YAML
VS
Scrypted
High-performance smart home and camera platform
| Feature | ESPHome | Scrypted |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,505 | ★ 5,839 |
| First released | 2018 | 2021 |
| Replaces | SmartThings | Google Home |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is ESPHome or Scrypted better?
Neither is universally better. ESPHome has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are ESPHome and Scrypted free and open-source?
Yes. ESPHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Scrypted under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ESPHome and Scrypted with Docker?
ESPHome: yes. Scrypted: yes.