Grafana Loki vs Grafana Tempo

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiGrafana Tempo
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 5,416
First released20182020
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsDatadog APM

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Grafana Tempo if…

  • Very cost-effective
  • Simple operations
Grafana Tempo details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Grafana Tempo better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana Loki and Grafana Tempo free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Grafana Tempo under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Grafana Tempo with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Grafana Tempo: yes.

Related comparisons