cAdvisor vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecAdvisorGrafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 19,342★ 28,687
First released20142018
ReplacesDatadogSplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose cAdvisor if…

  • Zero configuration
  • Lightweight
cAdvisor details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is cAdvisor or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community, while cAdvisor is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are cAdvisor and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. cAdvisor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run cAdvisor and Grafana Loki with Docker?

cAdvisor: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons