Lunalytics vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLunalyticsGrafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageCSSGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 1★ 28,687
First released20232018
ReplacesPingdom, Better UptimeSplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose Lunalytics if…

  • Easy to set up
  • Friendly interface
Lunalytics details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is Lunalytics or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community, while Lunalytics is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Lunalytics and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. Lunalytics is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Lunalytics and Grafana Loki with Docker?

Lunalytics: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons