Gatus vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGatusGrafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 11,748★ 28,687
First released20192018
ReplacesUptimeRobot, PingdomSplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose Gatus if…

  • Config as code
  • Extremely lightweight
  • Easy to version control
Gatus details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is Gatus or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community, while Gatus is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Gatus and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. Gatus is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Gatus and Grafana Loki with Docker?

Gatus: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons