Grafana Loki vs Speedtest Exporter
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Grafana Loki
Log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus
VS
Speedtest Exporter
Prometheus exporter for internet speed test results
| Feature | Grafana Loki | Speedtest Exporter |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,687 | ★ 238 |
| First released | 2018 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Splunk, Datadog Logs | Speedtest.net |
Why pick each one
Choose Grafana Loki if…
- Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
- Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Choose Speedtest Exporter if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana Loki or Speedtest Exporter better?
Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community, while Speedtest Exporter is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Grafana Loki and Speedtest Exporter free and open-source?
Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Speedtest Exporter under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Grafana Loki and Speedtest Exporter with Docker?
Grafana Loki: yes. Speedtest Exporter: yes.