Grafana Loki vs Quickwit

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiQuickwit
CategoryMonitoring & StatusSearch Engines
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 11,471
First released20182021
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsSplunk, Elasticsearch

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Quickwit if…

  • Very cost effective at scale
  • Modern Rust codebase
Quickwit details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Quickwit better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana Loki and Quickwit free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Quickwit under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Quickwit with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Quickwit: yes.

Related comparisons