Grafana Loki vs Blackbox Exporter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiBlackbox Exporter
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB32 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 5,818
First released20182016
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsPingdom

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Blackbox Exporter if…

  • Simple uptime monitoring
  • Tiny footprint
Blackbox Exporter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Blackbox Exporter better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community, while Blackbox Exporter is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Grafana Loki and Blackbox Exporter free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Blackbox Exporter under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Blackbox Exporter with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Blackbox Exporter: yes.

Related comparisons