Grafana Loki vs PostHog

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiPostHog
CategoryMonitoring & StatusWeb Analytics
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 37,548
First released20182020
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsGoogle Analytics, Mixpanel, Amplitude

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose PostHog if…

  • Comprehensive product suite
  • Session replay included
  • Open-core model
PostHog details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or PostHog better?

Neither is universally better. PostHog has the larger community, while Grafana Loki is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Grafana Loki and PostHog free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and PostHog under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and PostHog with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. PostHog: yes.

Related comparisons