Grafana Loki vs Parca

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiParca
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 4,935
First released20182021
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsDatadog Profiler

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Parca if…

  • No code changes needed
  • Low overhead
Parca details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Parca better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana Loki and Parca free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Parca under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Parca with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Parca: yes.

Related comparisons