Grafana Loki vs NUT Exporter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiNUT Exporter
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 333
First released20182019
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsAPC PowerChute

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose NUT Exporter if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
NUT Exporter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or NUT Exporter better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana Loki and NUT Exporter free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and NUT Exporter under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and NUT Exporter with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. NUT Exporter: yes.

Related comparisons