Grafana Loki vs ntopng

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana Lokintopng
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoLua
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 8,069
First released20182013
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsSolarWinds NetFlow

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose ntopng if…

  • Deep network visibility
  • Fast packet processing
ntopng details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or ntopng better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana Loki and ntopng free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ntopng under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and ntopng with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. ntopng: yes.

Related comparisons