Grafana Loki vs Metabase

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiMetabase
CategoryMonitoring & StatusWeb Analytics
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoClojure
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 48,597
First released20182015
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsTableau, Looker

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Metabase if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 48.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Clojure
Metabase details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Metabase better?

Neither is universally better. Metabase has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana Loki and Metabase free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Metabase under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Metabase with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Metabase: yes.

Related comparisons