Grafana Loki vs Matomo

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiMatomo
CategoryMonitoring & StatusWeb Analytics
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 21,749
First released20182007
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsGoogle Analytics

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Matomo if…

  • Comprehensive analytics
  • Privacy-respecting
  • Mature and extensible
Matomo details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Matomo better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana Loki and Matomo free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Matomo under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Matomo with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Matomo: yes.

Related comparisons