Linkwarden vs omnom
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Linkwarden
Collaborative bookmark manager with page archiving
VS
omnom
Bookmarking with full-page snapshot archiving
| Feature | Linkwarden | omnom |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 96 · Excellent | 70 · Good |
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 19,833 | ★ 665 |
| First released | 2022 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Raindrop.io | Pocket, Raindrop.io |
What are Linkwarden and omnom?
Linkwarden
Linkwarden is a collaborative bookmark manager that saves links and automatically archives full webpage snapshots. It targets individuals and teams who want preserved, organized bookmarks. It is deployed via Docker.
- Automatic webpage archiving
- Collections and collaboration
- Full-text search
- Browser extension
omnom
omnom is a self-hosted bookmarking service that stores both the link and a full snapshot of the page at the time it was saved. This guarantees access to content even if the original page changes or disappears.
- Full-page snapshots
- Browser extension
- Tagging and search
- Multi-user support
Linkwarden vs omnom: key differences
Linkwarden is written in TypeScript, while omnom is built with Go. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for Linkwarden versus MIT for omnom. Omnom is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Linkwarden. Omnom is the more established project (first released 2020), while Linkwarden arrived in 2022. Linkwarden has the considerably larger community, at 19,833 GitHub stars versus 665.
Why pick each one
Choose Linkwarden if…
- Preserves pages permanently
- Good collaboration
- Modern UI
Watch out for
- Requires Postgres
- Archiving uses more storage
Choose omnom if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Watch out for
- Snapshots use disk space
- Smaller community
Frequently asked questions
Is Linkwarden or omnom better?
Neither is universally better. Linkwarden has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Linkwarden and omnom free and open-source?
Yes. Linkwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and omnom under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Linkwarden and omnom with Docker?
Linkwarden: yes. omnom: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Linkwarden or omnom?
omnom has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Linkwarden. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.