Tinode vs Openfire

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureTinodeOpenfire
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoJava
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 13,452★ 3,052
First released20162004
ReplacesWhatsApp, SlackSlack, Microsoft Teams

Why pick each one

Choose Tinode if…

  • Good developer foundation
  • Multiple clients
  • Lightweight
Tinode details

Choose Openfire if…

  • Easy to administer
  • Long track record
Openfire details

Frequently asked questions

Is Tinode or Openfire better?

Neither is universally better. Tinode has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Tinode and Openfire free and open-source?

Yes. Tinode is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Openfire under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Tinode and Openfire with Docker?

Tinode: yes. Openfire: yes.

Related comparisons