Tinode vs Syphon
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Tinode
Open-source instant messaging server
VS
Syphon
Privacy-focused Matrix client built with Flutter
| Feature | Tinode | Syphon |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Dart |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,452 | ★ 1,061 |
| First released | 2016 | 2020 |
| Replaces | WhatsApp, Slack | WhatsApp, Discord |
Why pick each one
Choose Syphon if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Dart
Frequently asked questions
Is Tinode or Syphon better?
Neither is universally better. Tinode has the larger community, while Syphon is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Tinode and Syphon free and open-source?
Yes. Tinode is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Syphon under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Tinode and Syphon with Docker?
Tinode: yes. Syphon: check the project docs for container support.