Linkding vs omnom
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Linkding
Minimal and fast self-hosted bookmark manager
VS
omnom
Bookmarking with full-page snapshot archiving
| Feature | Linkding | omnom |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,018 | ★ 653 |
| First released | 2019 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Raindrop.io | Pocket, Raindrop.io |
Why pick each one
Choose omnom if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Linkding or omnom better?
Linkding is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider omnom if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Linkding and omnom free and open-source?
Yes. Linkding is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and omnom under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Linkding and omnom with Docker?
Linkding: yes. omnom: yes.