Linka vs Floccus

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLinkaFloccus
CategoryBookmarks & Read-It-LaterBookmarks & Read-It-Later
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcesource
GitHub stars★ 33★ 8,322
First released20212015
ReplacesRaindrop.ioRaindrop.io, Chrome Sync

Why pick each one

Choose Linka if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
Linka details

Choose Floccus if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Floccus details

Frequently asked questions

Is Linka or Floccus better?

Neither is universally better. Floccus has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Linka and Floccus free and open-source?

Yes. Linka is licensed under MIT and Floccus under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Linka and Floccus with Docker?

Linka: yes. Floccus: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons