ArchiveBox vs Linka
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ArchiveBox
Self-hosted web archiving from bookmarks and feeds
VS
Linka
Fast bookmark manager with keyboard-driven search
| Feature | ArchiveBox | Linka |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,079 | ★ 33 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Raindrop.io |
Why pick each one
Choose ArchiveBox if…
- Thorough page preservation
- Imports from many sources
- Open formats
Choose Linka if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is ArchiveBox or Linka better?
Neither is universally better. ArchiveBox has the larger community, while Linka is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ArchiveBox and Linka free and open-source?
Yes. ArchiveBox is licensed under MIT and Linka under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ArchiveBox and Linka with Docker?
ArchiveBox: yes. Linka: yes.