Jami vs Chatwoot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJamiChatwoot
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageC++Ruby
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarydocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 41★ 35,596
First released20162019
ReplacesSkype, Zoom, WhatsAppIntercom, Zendesk, Drift

Why pick each one

Choose Jami if…

  • No infrastructure required
  • Strong privacy model
Jami details

Choose Chatwoot if…

  • Polished customer support workflow
  • Active development
Chatwoot details

Frequently asked questions

Is Jami or Chatwoot better?

Neither is universally better. Chatwoot has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Jami and Chatwoot free and open-source?

Yes. Jami is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Chatwoot under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Jami and Chatwoot with Docker?

Jami: check the project docs for container support. Chatwoot: yes.

Related comparisons