Jitsi Videobridge vs Jami
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jitsi Videobridge
Scalable WebRTC-compatible video routing engine
VS
Jami
Fully distributed, peer-to-peer encrypted communication
| Feature | Jitsi Videobridge | Jami |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Kotlin | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,093 | ★ 41 |
| First released | 2013 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Zoom, Twilio | Skype, Zoom, WhatsApp |
Why pick each one
Choose Jitsi Videobridge if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Kotlin
Frequently asked questions
Is Jitsi Videobridge or Jami better?
Neither is universally better. Jitsi Videobridge has the larger community, while Jami is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Jitsi Videobridge and Jami free and open-source?
Yes. Jitsi Videobridge is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Jami under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jitsi Videobridge and Jami with Docker?
Jitsi Videobridge: yes. Jami: check the project docs for container support.