Jitsi Videobridge vs eturnal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jitsi Videobridge
Scalable WebRTC-compatible video routing engine
VS
eturnal
STUN and TURN server for real-time applications
| Feature | Jitsi Videobridge | eturnal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Kotlin | Erlang |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,093 | ★ 340 |
| First released | 2013 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Zoom, Twilio | Twilio STUN/TURN |
Why pick each one
Choose Jitsi Videobridge if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Kotlin
Choose eturnal if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Erlang
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Jitsi Videobridge or eturnal better?
Neither is universally better. Jitsi Videobridge has the larger community, while eturnal is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Jitsi Videobridge and eturnal free and open-source?
Yes. Jitsi Videobridge is licensed under Apache-2.0 and eturnal under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jitsi Videobridge and eturnal with Docker?
Jitsi Videobridge: yes. eturnal: yes.