SHSelfHostIndex

Timewarrior vs TimeOff Management

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TI Timewarrior Command-line time tracking with powerful reporting VS TI TimeOff Management Self-hosted leave and absence tracking for companies
FeatureTimewarriorTimeOff Management
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseMITBSD-2-Clause
LanguageC++JavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,637★ 1,041
First released20162015
ReplacesTogglBambooHR, Vacation Tracker

Why pick each one

Choose Timewarrior if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
Timewarrior details

Choose TimeOff Management if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
TimeOff Management details

Frequently asked questions

Is Timewarrior or TimeOff Management better?

Timewarrior is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider TimeOff Management if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Timewarrior and TimeOff Management free and open-source?

Yes. Timewarrior is licensed under MIT and TimeOff Management under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Timewarrior and TimeOff Management with Docker?

Timewarrior: check the project docs for container support. TimeOff Management: yes.

Related comparisons