Phlare vs Thanos
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Phlare
Self-hosted status page and incident communication tool
VS
Thanos
Highly available Prometheus setup with long-term storage
| Feature | Phlare | Thanos |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,183 | ★ 14,167 |
| First released | 2014 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Statuspage, Better Uptime | Datadog, Grafana Cloud |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Phlare or Thanos better?
Phlare is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Thanos if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Phlare and Thanos free and open-source?
Yes. Phlare is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Thanos under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Phlare and Thanos with Docker?
Phlare: yes. Thanos: yes.