Dozzle vs Phlare
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dozzle
Real-time log viewer for Docker containers
VS
Phlare
Self-hosted status page and incident communication tool
| Feature | Dozzle | Phlare |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,984 | ★ 15,183 |
| First released | 2018 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Datadog Logs | Statuspage, Better Uptime |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Dozzle or Phlare better?
Neither is universally better. Phlare has the larger community, while Dozzle is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Dozzle and Phlare free and open-source?
Yes. Dozzle is licensed under MIT and Phlare under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dozzle and Phlare with Docker?
Dozzle: yes. Phlare: yes.