Dozzle vs Thanos
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dozzle
Real-time log viewer for Docker containers
VS
Thanos
Highly available Prometheus setup with long-term storage
| Feature | Dozzle | Thanos |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,984 | ★ 14,167 |
| First released | 2018 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Datadog Logs | Datadog, Grafana Cloud |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Dozzle or Thanos better?
Neither is universally better. Thanos has the larger community, while Dozzle is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Dozzle and Thanos free and open-source?
Yes. Dozzle is licensed under MIT and Thanos under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dozzle and Thanos with Docker?
Dozzle: yes. Thanos: yes.