Phlare vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePhlareGrafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseAGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 15,183★ 28,687
First released20142018
ReplacesStatuspage, Better UptimeSplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose Phlare if…

  • Polished public-facing page
  • REST API
Phlare details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is Phlare or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Phlare and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. Phlare is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Phlare and Grafana Loki with Docker?

Phlare: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons