Kuma Mieru vs Phoenix Panel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kuma Mieru
Modern status page frontend powered by Uptime Kuma data
VS
Phoenix Panel
Lightweight self-hosted status page and uptime monitor
| Feature | Kuma Mieru | Phoenix Panel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 798 | ★ 1 |
| First released | 2024 | 2022 |
| Replaces | StatusPage, Instatus | StatusPage, Better Uptime |
Why pick each one
Choose Kuma Mieru if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Phoenix Panel if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is Kuma Mieru or Phoenix Panel better?
Neither is universally better. Kuma Mieru has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Kuma Mieru and Phoenix Panel free and open-source?
Yes. Kuma Mieru is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Phoenix Panel under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kuma Mieru and Phoenix Panel with Docker?
Kuma Mieru: yes. Phoenix Panel: yes.