Restic Cron vs Backup tool nono Plakar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Restic Cron
Containerized scheduled restic backup runner
VS
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
| Feature | Restic Cron | Backup tool nono Plakar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | ISC |
| Language | Shell | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 702 | ★ 2,013 |
| First released | 2019 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Backblaze | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose Restic Cron if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Shell
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Restic Cron or Backup tool nono Plakar better?
Neither is universally better. Backup tool nono Plakar has the larger community, while Restic Cron is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Restic Cron and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?
Yes. Restic Cron is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Restic Cron and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?
Restic Cron: yes. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.