Kopia vs Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKopiaBackup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoShell
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB32 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 13,798★ 3,608
First released20192014
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteTime Machine

Why pick each one

Choose Kopia if…

  • GUI and CLI both available
  • Fast and efficient
  • Modern design
Kopia details

Choose Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kopia or Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup better?

Neither is universally better. Kopia has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Kopia and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup free and open-source?

Yes. Kopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kopia and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup with Docker?

Kopia: yes. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons