Kopia vs resticprofile
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Kopia
Fast, encrypted backup with a clean interface
VS
resticprofile
Self-hosted backup orchestration for Restic repositories
| Feature | Kopia | resticprofile |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 94 · Excellent | 77 · Good |
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,188 | ★ 1,425 |
| First released | 2019 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | Backblaze |
What are Kopia and resticprofile?
Kopia
Kopia is a fast and secure backup tool that creates encrypted, deduplicated snapshots and offers both a CLI and a desktop GUI. It targets users who want modern backups with a clean interface. It is deployed as a binary or via Docker.
- Encrypted deduplicated snapshots
- Both CLI and desktop GUI
- Many storage backends
- Compression and policies
resticprofile
Resticprofile is a configuration profiles manager for Restic that simplifies running scheduled backups. It lets you define complex backup workflows in YAML, TOML, or JSON files.
- Profile-based Restic config
- Scheduling integration
- Multiple config formats
Kopia vs resticprofile: key differences
Both projects are written in Go. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Kopia versus GPL-3.0 for resticprofile. Resticprofile is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Kopia. Kopia has the considerably larger community, at 14,188 GitHub stars versus 1,425. Kopia lists first-class Docker deployment; resticprofile does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Kopia if…
- GUI and CLI both available
- Fast and efficient
- Modern design
Watch out for
- Younger than Restic
- Advanced options can confuse
Choose resticprofile if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Kopia or resticprofile better?
Kopia is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider resticprofile if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Kopia and resticprofile free and open-source?
Yes. Kopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and resticprofile under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kopia and resticprofile with Docker?
Kopia: yes. resticprofile: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Kopia or resticprofile?
resticprofile has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Kopia. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.