Backup tool nono Plakar vs resticprofile
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Backup tool nono Plakar | resticprofile |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 86 · Excellent | 77 · Good |
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | ISC | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,068 | ★ 1,425 |
| First released | 2021 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, CrashPlan | Backblaze |
What are Backup tool nono Plakar and resticprofile?
Backup tool nono Plakar
Plakar is a modern open-source backup solution that creates encrypted, deduplicated snapshots with built-in integrity verification. It includes a web UI for browsing and restoring data.
- Encrypted deduplicated snapshots
- Integrity verification
- Web UI for restores
resticprofile
Resticprofile is a configuration profiles manager for Restic that simplifies running scheduled backups. It lets you define complex backup workflows in YAML, TOML, or JSON files.
- Profile-based Restic config
- Scheduling integration
- Multiple config formats
Backup tool nono Plakar vs resticprofile: key differences
Both projects are written in Go. Licensing differs — ISC for Backup tool nono Plakar versus GPL-3.0 for resticprofile. Resticprofile is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Backup tool nono Plakar. Resticprofile is the more established project (first released 2019), while Backup tool nono Plakar arrived in 2021. Backup tool nono Plakar lists first-class Docker deployment; resticprofile does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Choose resticprofile if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Backup tool nono Plakar or resticprofile better?
Neither is universally better. Backup tool nono Plakar has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Backup tool nono Plakar and resticprofile free and open-source?
Yes. Backup tool nono Plakar is licensed under ISC and resticprofile under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Backup tool nono Plakar and resticprofile with Docker?
Backup tool nono Plakar: yes. resticprofile: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Backup tool nono Plakar or resticprofile?
resticprofile has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Backup tool nono Plakar. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs Autorestic
- resticprofile vs Autorestic
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs Backrest
- resticprofile vs Backrest
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs BackupNinja
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs BackupPC
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs BorgBackup
- resticprofile vs BorgBackup
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs borgmatic
- resticprofile vs borgmatic